ryzen 9 3900x amazon This is a topic that many people are looking for. bluevelvetrestaurant.com is a channel providing useful information about learning, life, digital marketing and online courses …. it will help you have an overview and solid multi-faceted knowledge . Today, bluevelvetrestaurant.com would like to introduce to you REALLY GOOD: My Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X Review and Benchmarks!. Following along are instructions in the video below:
” s up guys welcome to my launch review video for these new long awaited rison. Rison. 3000. Series cpus.
I have the 8 core. 16 thread. Risin. 7.
330. 700. And the 12 core. 24.
Thread. Risin. 9. 3900.
X. Here. Today have a whole bunch of benchmarks to share with you guys speaking of benchmarks. Though.
My mind is pretty much mush from running so many for this past week. So i really hope you guys find them useful. And although we all have been waiting for this launch for what seems like forever now. I do have one request for amd.
Please never do a major cpu launch and a major gpu launch on the same day ever again even if it s 7 7. And that that is so clever and perfect because they re both built on the 7 9 of your process. I need sleep. And yes.
I will have a radeon rx. 50. 750. 700.
Xt review up in a few hours. As well so subscribe to my channel. If you re not already cooler masters sf series fans feature addressable rgb leds and a square design to maximize fan mount coverage and generate high pressure air flow. Available in standard hundred twenty millimeter size.
As the sf 120 p. As well as the dual fan 240 millimeter. Option. In the sf 240p.
A rgb cooler master has integrated multiple layers of noise. Reduction. Technology and an optimized family design into this series so click the sponsor link in the description to learn more rison 3000 series cpus they are socket am for they re based on seven nanometers into architecture. Those are the important points for today.
I m not going to rehash any of the gritty details because we ve been discussing these for months to be honest instead. I m gonna be getting right to the benchmarks starting with the setup. I configured to test beds. 1 for amd and one for intel.
And i tried to keep minimal variance between the two setups both rigs are open test beds and run the same memory cpu cooler and graphics card. The memory is a 16 gig. 2. By 8 gig kit of g scale tridents.
A royal rgb running at 3600 megahertz in casa latency. 16. Cpu cooler is the new noctua nhu. 12.
A tower cooler. Which is on the expensive side for an air cooler. But it allowed me to test the temperatures between each cpu and the graphics card is the asus rog strix r. Tx 2080 ti running with the out of the box manufacturer overclock the amd testbed was based on the gigabyte x5 70 horas master motherboard running uefi version f 5e which includes amd jeesus cpu microcode version 100 3 a be windows 10 version 1903 installed on a 512 gig.
Samsung 970 pro and that to nvme ssd and forego juice we d have a cooler master mwe 1200 watt platinum power supply. The intel testbed is based on the asrock z3 90. Taichi ultimate motherboard with the same noctua and a 212 eight hour cooler that same 16 gig kit of g scale. Royal.
3600 speed memory and the asus rt x. Xx atti for storage. There s another 512 gig sim. Son.
970 pro. M2. Nvme. Ssd.
And the power supply is an evga supernova. G3. 750. Watt unit for comparison.
I have five cpus total intel is represented by their two most recent flagship parts the 8 core 16 thread core. I nine ninety nine hundred k and the six core 12 thread core i7 8700 k. Which cost four hundred ninety dollars and three hundred and sixty dollars respectively as of the time of filming. These are both based on intel s most recent 14 nanometer cpu microarchitectures on the amd side.
We of course. Have the new 8 core. 16. Thread rise in 730 700.
X. And the 12 core. 24. Thread.
Rise in 9..
3900. X. And i m also going to be including the rise in 2000 series flagship. The 8 core.
16 thread rise in 7 2700. X. Which is based on 12 nanometers n. Architecture as opposed to the 7 nanometers and 2 architecture.
That the resin 3000 series. Is based on and now some benchmarks. I want to start off by talking about frequencies power draw and temperatures. Because i think that s a big part of the story here all the cpus are running at stocks beads with xmp enabled.
But no mce or multi core. Enhancement or the relative equivalent to that on the amd side. All the cpus can adjust their frequency on the fly depending on load and temperature. So i wanted to show the peak frequency.
That a core or two might hit and the sustain frequency during a night of 64 stability test. The 9900 k. Has a peak turbo of 5. Gigahertz and the 8700 k goes up to.
47. Yoghurts under. Load though the. 9900.
K. Hits. 47 gigahertz across all cores and the 8700. K.
Does 43. Gigahertz of course all these chips could be overclocked. But i m sticking with stock settings for this. Video.
Meanwhile the 2700. X. Hits. 43.
5. Gigahertz. Max. And just under.
4. Gigahertz. Sustained across all. Cores.
Well the 3700. X. Got just a bit higher to 437. 5.
Gigahertz. While also showing off the best sustained. All core frequencies in my testing at four point three to five. Gigahertz finally the 3900 x hit over.
45. Gigahertz. 45. Five.
On a couple cores to be specific. But that dropped off pretty quickly down to four point. Oh five gigahertz is sustained during the stress test. I also measured temperatures during the burn in both average and maximum as you can see here these can be compared since i was using the same cooler and all tests with minimal variance in ambient temperature.
The excellent. Noctua and hu 12a. Did a great job keeping these cool. Even the 9900 k.
Which is still a hot chip even a stock with a 101 degrees. Celsius max temperature and a more reasonable eighty point five degrees celsius on average. The 3900 x is only a degree cooler on average. But did not peak nearly as hot which is impressive since it does have 50 more cores 12 versus.
18. The 3700 x. Though with more cores and a higher sustained frequency than 8700 k absolutely wins this test with a 71 point to see average temperature. And it never got above 80 power.
Draws. The other side of the efficiency discussion. And i measured full system draw during a blender cpu render test. I was actually blown away by this comparison.
Just 161 watts on average for the 3700 x. That is 50 watts. Less than the second gen 2700 x. And that s more than 80.
Watts. Less than the 87 out of k and literally half the power draw of the 99 hundred k. They re both a core 16 thread parts by the way. Wow.
Amd like wow. The 12 core 3900 x. Comes. In with less draw.
Than the 8700 k..
Or the 9900 k. As well. Again. 6 8.
Core parts compared to a 12 core. That s just very very nice as well let s move into our performance tests. We re gonna start with some cpu benchmarks and then we ll do some gaming benchmarks starting with cinebench our 20 and here we can see the 3900 x dominating everyone else over 7000. I m going to be using it as a point of comparison from here on out the 3700 x.
And 9900 k both scored just shy of 4920 700. X coming in just over 4000. And 3404 for the 8700 k. The cinebench single thread test is where amd has suffered in the past.
And you can see that represented by the 2700 x s score of 438. But the 3900 x. And 3700 x. Both scored over 500 in this test.
While the 9900 k. And 8700 k scored 485 and 479 respectively. That is a small win. But a win nonetheless for the rison 3000 series scoring about 3 or 5 respectively.
Better than the 9900 k. And 8700 k. Next to cpu mark. A cpu focused test.
That s part of the past mark. Performance. Suites here we have an overall score of. 30000 actually over 30000.
For the 3900. X compare that to. The 90 900k score of just under. 20000 at more than 10000.
Points higher. Although it does scale with the core and thread count of the two cpus the 3900 x. Is about 36 faster than the 9900 k. And about 47 faster than the 8700.
K moving over to the single thread. Test and the 2700. X. Again is representing.
Where we re coming from here with a score of 20 to 85. Meanwhile. The 3900 x. And 3700 x.
Is going much closer to about 2900 here again. The single thread tests seem to be on par or even a little bit better with the rise in 3000 series. But based on the rest of my tests. I think.
This is because these are shorter tests and the rise in cpus are actually hitting higher frequencies as my earlier tests already showed under sustained load. We re not going to be hitting as quite as high frequencies with the rise in cpus and that we bore now doesn t move into the game testing. But before that let s move on to blender. First is a fishy cat render.
And this is just time in seconds. So remember a lower score is better here the 3900 x wins. Once again with a 22 point one second time the slowest was the. 8700 k with 309.
Seconds still the 9900. K was about 95. Percent. Slower 8700 k.
Was about 40 slower as compared to the 3900 x. Next up is a bmw 27 render. Which takes quite a bit longer the 3900 x here came in at 161 seconds. Which is very fast over 35 faster than the 9900 k.
Almost a hundred percent faster than the 8700. K and 65 percent faster than the 2700. X. Let s look at some production performance next.
We re using the adobe premiere media encoder to encode about a three minute 4k. H264. Video. 40.
Megabits per second. And we re just showing comparative time and seconds. Here once again so lower is better 3900. X.
Wins with 270. Seconds. 3700 x is about. 45 percent slower 2700.
X is about 92. Percent. Slower 9900 k. And 8700 k.
About 15. And 25 slower. I then took that same 3 minute video brought it into handbrake and took it from 4k down to 1080 or 1080 30 frames per second using their fast free sets here. We re listing the time in seconds and also the encoding speed in frames per second.
So the time slower is better for encoding speed the higher number is better..
We had 60 frames per second for the 3900 x. That was definitely the fastest about 18 percent faster than the 3700 x. And about 21. Percent.
Faster than the 9900. K. Next up is. V ray version 40.
7. This is a ray tracing software suite that runs at tests and outputs a result in case. Samples we can see the. 3900 x just shy of.
20000 with the score of 19000. 727 compare that to the 87 or k. All the way down there at ten thousand four hundred twenty seven hundred x gets a bit better to twelve thousand 205 3900 x. Was over thirty percent faster than the 3700 x.
And about 25 percent faster than the. 99. Hundred. K.
Here and our. Final. Cpu benchmark is corona 13. This.
Again is measuring time in seconds. So lower is better 3900 x. Finished. In 73 seconds.
Compare that to the 9900 k. Is 97. Seconds. Which is about 33 slower next up.
We have a few game tests to try to suss out some relative game performance first off the 3d mark firestrike ultra synthetic test. This is a high resolution test gives an overall score as well as graphics and physics. The graphics test might give us an indication of relative performance between these cpus with the same graphics card. But honestly there was less than 1 difference between all of these scores so not too much to say.
There the physics score gives us a bit more of a story of the actual overall performance of each cpu with the 3900. X. Coming in with the score over. 28000 compared to the 9900.
Ches just shy of 24000. The 9900 k is about 16 slower here and the 8700 k. Is about 35 slower next up is 3d. Mark x.
Pi. This is a directx 12 test again. The overall scores are fairly similar here graphics. Score is once again also really similar only about a percentage point difference between them.
Although the 9900 k. And the 8700 k were just a little bit faster in the graphics department cpu tests. Though again is going to show us more of a raw score about cpu performance and here the 3900 x wins. Once again with the score of eleven thousand seven hundred ninety nine hundred k did break 10000 got close to eleven.
Thousand but it was still about 72. Percent slower and now a couple actual game tests running at 1920 by 1080 and if history is any indicator here the 9900 k. Should be just a bit faster at a lower resolution. 1920.
By 1080 then its rison counterparts. And that was the case and shadow of the tomb raider in direct x12 mode was the largest gap i saw when it comes to the 9900. K beating. The.
3900. X. 178. Faster with a frame rate.
Of. 140. 97. As compared to the 3900 x.
s 127 point. 1. And then our final test here is grand theft auto. 5 directx.
11. Still running at 1920 by 1080 and here we see a similar story once again when it comes to gaming. Which is that the 9900 k. Does still seem to have a little bit of an edge with a hundred and sixty four average frames per second overall just barely beating out the 3900.
X with 158. Frames. Per. Second that is about 38.
Percent. Faster. For the 9900 k. 8700.
K. Was not quite able to beat. It though is actually about 4 slower. But again we have to keep in mind that the 8700 k.
Is running at about 400 megahertz slower than the 9900 k..
Here. I m pretty confident that if you took the 87 under k. We ramped up the clock speed to be equivalent with the 9900 k. We d see the same performance here as well so finally here we have some overall slides.
Just mashing together all of the data. I have accumulated to give you some semblance of i guess. Closure is what we re really looking for here. But i m using the 3900 x.
As the 100 baseline and then showing the relative performance of all the other cpus and here. We can see the 3700 x. Just barely beats out the 9900 k. With about 17.
To 18 percent. Less. Performance overall than the. 3900.
X. 2700. X. Meanwhile.
Comes. In. At. 715.
8700. K takes up the. Rear was 65. 07.
As for gaming performance. I did not run a ton of gaming tests. So we re only really looking at four tests combined together here so bear that in mind. But with the 3900 x.
As the 100 baseline. The 8700 k. And 9900 k. Actually did demonstrate a bit of increased gaming performance 99er.
K in particular about 58. Percent better than the 3900 x. Although that s mainly because of the shadow of the tomb raider score. Meanwhile the 3700 x.
Is just a couple percentage points. Behind and the 2700 x. Is 7 cents. Lower finally.
Here s a slide comparing both of those performance metrics. With the price of each card. So 360 for the 8700 k. And 490 for the 9900 k.
I m going with current prices for the readily available. Cpus that are already. Out and then of. Course the launch prices for the 3700.
X. And 3900 x. They ve had to sum up this slide. I would say that the gaming numbers all look very very similar.
The 2700 x. Well. The compute performance scores show a clear lead for amd. So conclusions now.
I am impressed amd has absolutely hyped up products in the past that have fallen flat. But i m very happy to say that that is not the case with the rise in 3000 series at least not these. Two cpus that i have here. Intel s argument since first gen rise and launched has always been about their single core performance.
And there definitely is still a little bit of an edge for team blue there especially when it comes to gaming. But it has shrunk down so much that it is instantly offset by everything else the raw compute performance the value you get when it comes to the core and thread count compared to intel. And the stunning increases in power efficiency. That intel just does not have an answer for right now combine that with a platform that has come into its own with a wide array of full featured motherboards.
Available. And the previously unmentioned. In this video upgrade to pci express. Gen.
4. This time around. Which i just kind of left. This little bonus cherry on the cake and well.
I see this is an absolute win for amd. I don t know how else to put it i really hope you guys have enjoyed this video. Though i will put links to as much stuff as i can that i ve shown off here today down in the vias description and one more reminder that there is another. Benchmark.
Laden video on the radeon rx. 50. 750. 700.
Xt coming to you in just a few hours. So subscribe. If you want to see that if the thumbs up button. Anyway if you enjoyed this video and thought it was good and we ll see you guys in the ” .
.
Thank you for watching all the articles on the topic REALLY GOOD: My Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X Review and Benchmarks!. All shares of bluevelvetrestaurant.com are very good. We hope you are satisfied with the article. For any questions, please leave a comment below. Hopefully you guys support our website even more.
description:
tags:
